John Vlissides Award


In recognition of the contributions to computer science that John Vlissides made during his lifetime, SIGPLAN has established the John Vlissides Award. The award is presented annually to a doctoral student participating in the OOPSLA Doctoral Symposium showing significant promise in applied software research. All doctoral candidates participating in the annual OOPSLA Doctoral Symposium are eligible. The award includes a prize of $2,000.

The John Vlissides Award was established by generous contributions from the following companies, individuals, and organizations: IBM, Addison-Wesley, William Pugh, and SIGPLAN.

Selection Committee

The selection committee consists of the following members:

  • the OOPSLA Doctoral Symposium Committee,
  • the OOPSLA Program Chair, and
  • a representative of SIGPLAN appointed by the SIGPLAN Chair.

The committee is chaired by the OOPSLA Program Chair. The OOPSLA Program Chair shall adjudicate conflicts of interest, appointing substitutes to the committee as necessary.

Recipients

2014 Christopher Hall, UC Santa Barbara

Citation:

Christopher Hall’s work explores the classic design tension between user friendly versus expert friendly user interface design as well as the classic design tension between binary versus printable data format design. His work sets out to expose both sets of design tensions as having the same cause and solution. Information representations and user interface architecture both lack a self descriptive capacity. By raising the common denominator of computing to a foundation that is metadata friendly, structured editing can place human-readable strings and graphical user interfaces on the same spectrum. Smoothing out the gradients of interacting with computation creates new opportunities for unifying software systems as a developer and having an outlet for accruing and applying computational literacy as an end-user.

2013 Zalia Shams, Virginia Tech

Citation:

Zalia Shams’ work is motivated by the observation that software testing is frequently being added to programming courses at many schools, but current assessment techniques for evaluating student-written software tests are imperfect. Code coverage measures are typically used in practice, but that approach does not assess how much of the expected behavior is checked by the tests and sometimes overestimates the true quality of the tests. Running one student’s tests against others’ code (known as all-pairs testing) and mutation analysis are better indicators of test quality but both of them posed a number of practical obstacles to classroom use. Her proposal describes technical obstacles behind using these two approaches in automated grading. Zalia has provided novel and practical solutions to apply all-pairs testing and mutation analysis of student-written tests, especially in an automated grading context.

2012 Gustavo Soares of the Federal University of Campina Grande, Brazil

Citation:

The winner of the Vlissides award is Gustavo Soares of the Federal University of Campina Grande, Brazil. His proposed thesis is entitled “Automated Behavioral Testing of Refactoring Engines”

2011 Hari K. Pyla, Virginia Tech

Citation:

Hari Pyla’s work is motivated by the need to leverage concurrency to achieve performance, and the challenge of avoiding deadlocks in concurrent shared memory programs. He has introduced Sammati, a new approach that transparently and deterministically detects and recovers from deadlocks, without requiring modification to source code. This approach not only avoids errors, but also allows more effective composition of lock-based code. Hari’s system also supports coarse-grained speculative parallelism, supporting difficult-to-parallelize applications and achieving significant speedups in practice.

2010 Márcio Ribeiro, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)

Citation:

Márcio Ribeiro’s research addresses the problem of maintaining software defined using “virtual separation of concerns.” The virtual separation of concerns technique presents software with features defined using code between #ifdef and #endif (as in the C preprocessor) to the programmer in a way that hides various features that are not of immediate interest. However, when maintaining such software, it is easy to break code in hidden features. The solution approach uses a specialized dataflow analysis that takes features and allowed feature combinations into account. The results of this analysis are used to warn the programmer if there are dependencies between the changed code and any hidden features. These ideas are being implemented in a tool that will allow independent development of parallel features.

2009 Tudor Dumitras, Carnegie Mellon University

Citation:

Tudor Dumitras’s research identifies and addresses the leading causes of both unplanned failures and planned downtime resulting from software upgrades in distributed systems. Traditional fault-tolerance approaches concentrate almost entirely on responding to, avoiding, or tolerating unexpected faults or security violations. However, scheduled events such as software upgrades account for most system unavailability and often introduce data loss or latent errors. Tudor defines three abstract properties required for improving the dependability of software upgrades. Building on empirically derived insights on current upgrade practices and problems, Tudor’s work harnesses the opportunities provided by emerging technologies such as cloud computing to simplify large-scale upgrades, to allow upgrades to be executed efficiently online, and to improve their dependability.

2008 Ciera Jaspan, Carnegie Mellon University

Citation:

Ciera Jaspan’s research targets the programming difficulties associated with using software frameworks. Plug-in writers need to satisfy a variety of framework constraints, and Ciera is directly motivated by the kinds of plug-in errors that frequently arise in today’s frameworks. She has defined a new abstraction for expressing framework constraints as well as lightweight annotations and an associated static analysis to enforce this abstraction. Ciera is focused on making the right tradeoffs to ensure her solution is useful in practice.